FAQs (Frequently Asked Questions)

- How much is this going to cost me?
- Are these cookie-cutter solutions offered by all these big name/big hype companies targeting small and medium-sized businesses, really going to help me?
- What about the guy down the street who can offer me a complete "custom" web site for $399?
- Isn't the network and equipment offered by these large companies better than what you can offer as a smaller organization?
- Why should I use the services of a small operation such as Xenocast when I can afford a large Madison Avenue ad agency or marketing firm? How can you possibly compete with them?


Q: How much is this going to cost me?
A: First thing to note is that we do not aspire to "cookie-cutter" solutions. We offer some entry-level options and we do this with a mind to helping those at that level to grow to a more powerful and sophisticated level. So yes we can offer you an entry-level hosting solution if that is all you need at this time. The cost will be anywhere from FREE to around $25/month if you've chosen some add-on options. (FREE hosting is normally limited to non-profits)
Aside from that, each solution is unique just as each situation for each organization is unique. There are dozens of large companies out there trying to sell cookie-cutter solutions. You'll get this!, and this! and that! - but really all you are getting - is lost in a million other "solutions" that look exactly the same as yours. Is this really going to help you? (see the UAQ section)

Q: Are these cookie-cutter solutions offered by all these big name/big hype companies targeting small and medium-sized businesses, really going to help me?
A: NO! Of course, not. How is creating an identical web site and canned promotion that will make you exactly like a million others, going to help you to stand out and distinguish yourself? Their goal is sheer volume i.e. you are simply a number to them and to your intended audience you are just one option among many others that look almost exactly the same. When they are looking for what you are offering, they are sure to be drawn to the unique and compelling rather than the processed and monotonous. Wouldn't you?

Q: What about the guy down the street who can offer me a complete "custom" web site for $399?
A: As the saying goes, you get what you pay for. Sometimes it seems that a cheap solution is your only answer. But it really isn't an answer. Is finding a so-called "bargain" that gets you minimal results at best, what your organization needs? It's really no bargain at all if it has no value returned. This could be a case of purely throwing away money only to have to spend more money down the road when you realize that you're getting nothing returned - or worse, representing your organization in a poor, unprofessional manner. The wise choice is staying away from the two extremes of the mega-corporation and the small operator who has neither the resources nor appropriate vision and skills. Seek out experienced professionals who can give you dedicated attention as well as services that return a value commensurate with your investment. If you spend $100 dollars and get a $1,000 return isn't that much better than spending $25 and getting $10 or nothing in return? Hiring a professional is an investment and bargain hunting will only get you inferior products and services. Why would true professionals with services that are high quality and in demand, sell themselves short and offer their services at a cut-rate price?

Q: Isn't the network and equipment offered by these large companies better than what you can offer as a smaller organization?
A: This is a good question and it goes to the heart of our approach as well as the approach of these large corporate mega-companies. Generally speaking, these mass production companies have good network connectivity. This is to say, how they connect to the Internet is normally through a high quality, high-bandwidth connection. That is the extent of the good news however. These companies are multi-billion dollar organizations. They think of doing business with small and medium sized organizations purely in terms of getting as many possible customers as they can possibly squeeze onto a web server and they do not dedicate their best equipment to this purpose (far from it!).

When they speak about small and medium sized customers in their corporate meetings they do not name names - because to them you are not individuals. It is all talk of "inventory turnover","maximized server ratios" etc. They are purely focused on getting the highest amount of customers on the least expensive hardware and expenditures. Last year for example, one of the largest web hosts in the country had tens of thousands of customers lose all their web serving because they had only one single server dedicated to DNS (domain name serv(ing)) for dozens of web servers. So when that server crashed all of those customer's web sites were down. It would have been a very small thing for this giant company to spend some money on a second DNS server or for that matter to run DNS software on an existing server as a secondary DNS server - for a backup measure. (they actually had their "secondary DNS" on the same server box! Now how is that for logic?) It just wasn't important enough to them however. It was a "calculated risk". Having tens of thousands of customers potentially (and actually) lose service compared to the relatively minor cost of a second server or even simply the time to install, configure and administrate a secondary software solution.

Contrarily our approach is just the opposite. Our servers are in fact better than what you will find in these cookie-cutter server farms that these mega-companies offer. We choose high end, brand named servers from IBM, Apple and HP, where industry norms are often "custom built" which in essence means they went for the cheapest parts they could find and slapped them together. We also add additional hardware and software as well as tweaking our operating systems and set stringent ratio limits (the amount of sites/applications that can run on an individual server) to improve the performance and security of each server. Adding additional NIC cards and additional hard drives for caching - separate from the RAID arrays (many mass-market servers don't even run RAID arrays), to a server for example, to increase "load balancing" performance is something that you won't typically find in the mass-market approach. To them it is just another "expense" and as long as they can cram a sufficient amount of sites onto a server they don't really care about the performance gains that their customers will see. We take the skilled artisan approach, with pride in attention to detail while the other approach is more akin to the processed chicken parts approach. And yes we also run on high speed, high bandwidth, redundant, fibre optic connections to the Internet. We don't own this multi-million dollar networking equipment but lease space and service from high end data centers with burstable bandwidth - so there will always be more than enough. This is the same kind of connectivity and networking used by the giant mass-market companies. Our network is at least as good as the mass market approach and combined with our high-end hardware and skilled networking and server administration, our overall package is at a much higher level of quality!

Q: Why should I use the services of a small operation such as Xenocast when I can afford a large Madison Avenue ad agency or marketing firm? How can you possibly compete with them?
A: The best media doesn't come from huge agencies. Smaller size = individualized attention. In just the way that great and revolutionary ideas don't normally come out of government programs or corporate think tanks. On a practical level those types of organizations exist with people rising to the top by attrition. That is, the good people leave to move onto bigger and better opportunities while the mediocre tend to stay around a long time and move up the ladder based upon being around longer than anyone else.

As one former large agency executive noted, large agencies are not built around rewarding the most creative and effective people nor are they focused upon results. They are built around the longevity of the employees - seniority. For that very reason, the most creative and talented people end up leaving at any opportunity for a larger salary or starting their own projects and companies, while the mediocre people stay around and become the leaders of these larger companies.

Bottom line is that with a larger ad agency or media company you get big budgets and very often mediocre results. They have great sales people who will tell you about how great your brand will be. They have complicated formulas and all sorts of mumbo jumbo to dazzle you with and you may end up with a really impressive bit of multi-media that has dazzling special effects and theme music (but what the heck does it do for you?). As a client you are singularly weighed in value by how much you can spend with them. Unless you're a major client, you will not receive individualized attention and despite all of their "awards" that got you interested in signing with them, most of your work will probably be done by junior staff and even by unpaid interns.

With us you get blooming creativity and vibrant people who know that they are critical to success. We have the necessity of achieving results to survive. We know that; We welcome that and thrive upon it. We are creative, we know we're creative but we're not here to simply impress you with how creative we are. Creativity is a benefit to us only in terms of how it best meets the needs of the project mission. It is a tool and not an end.

Hey, for some people it's great to be a tenured professor or a government employee who only has to punch a clock in a timely fashion to get paid and eventually retire. And maybe you have the luxury of spending your money on "art for art's sake." If you're in a competitive industry however, do you want people working for you based upon how long they've managed to stick around somewhere or do you want people who thrive on creativity and are rewarded based upon results? Our people choose to work in a small business environment. They thrive on being integral parts of every project that they are a part of. They don't work on Madison Avenue - and they don't want to! Dollar for dollar, we will beat the Madison Avenue types every time. If you don't have a multi-million dollar budget, then talk to us and see how you can compete and outperform those companies that do.

We operate at the street level - street smarts. This is where the action is. This is where entrepreneurs outwit and eventually outpace the establishment. Where David slays Goliath. We can help you to achieve your results cheaper and more effectively.

NEXT - UAQs >


Copyright © 2002-2008 Xenocast. All rights reserved.